The Daily Telegraph’s article, “Labour drops plans to protect single-sex spaces in Equality Act,” continues the paper’s fiercely anti-trans stance by framing Labour’s decision as a retreat from protecting women.
In reality, the Labour Party never had any plans to rewrite the Equality Act, making this a non-story from the start. Instead, Labour’s decision reflects a choice not to adopt the Conservative Party’s controversial proposals to redefine “sex” within the Act.
The Equality Act: Background and History
The Equality Act was introduced in 2010 by the Labour government under Prime Minister Gordon Brown, consolidating over 100 pieces of anti-discrimination legislation into one comprehensive law. Its aim was to protect individuals from discrimination and ensure equal treatment across various protected characteristics, including sex, race, disability, age, sexual orientation, religion, and gender reassignment. The Act was widely praised at the time for being a landmark piece of legislation that provided robust protection for marginalised groups and strengthened the UK’s commitment to equality.
Since its inception, the Act has been a cornerstone of anti-discrimination law, enabling protection in areas such as employment, education, and access to goods and services. It has clearly defined provisions for single-sex spaces, allowing organisations to restrict access based on sex where it is deemed “a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.” This means that current laws already permit organisations to maintain single-sex spaces in circumstances where it is necessary.
Conservative Proposals and Labour’s Response
The Conservative Party’s recent attempts to redefine “sex” as “biological sex” were spearheaded by former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and his GC cohort, who claimed the changes were necessary to protect women’s rights and single-sex spaces. This proposed alteration was part of Sunak’s unsuccessful 2022 Tory leadership campaign, in which he promised to rewrite the Act to ensure that “biological sex” took precedence over gender identity. It was also part of the Tories failed 2024 election campaign.
By not adopting this proposal, Labour has merely chosen to retain the original and more inclusive interpretation of the Equality Act. Anneliese Dodds confirmed that the party is “proud of the Equality Act and the rights and protections it affords women,” while also indicating that there were no plans to amend the legislation.
Misleading Claims from the Conservative Opposition
The article includes comments from Conservative shadow women and equalities minister Mims Davies, who accuses Labour of “appeasing woke ideologues” and argues that only through legally enshrining single-sex spaces can women be provided with “clarity, dignity, privacy, and safety.” However, this ignores the fact that the existing Equality Act already permits single-sex spaces where necessary, and there is no evidence that changing the Act’s definition of sex would provide any additional protections for women.
This is not a story of Labour dropping plans to protect women, but rather one of refusing to pursue unnecessary changes that could harm the very communities the Equality Act was designed to protect. That, of course, is the ultimate aim of the GC movement.